How Napplied Pricing Works: Platform Plans and Per-Role Pipelines

Most hiring software is priced by seat: a fixed annual fee per recruiter license, regardless of how many roles that recruiter actually closes in a given year. LinkedIn Recruiter's Corporate tier runs $10,800 to $15,000 per seat per year 1; enterprise ATS platforms like Greenhouse are sold on custom annual quotes, and buyer-reported figures for them vary widely by source 2. Those contracts don't move whether a recruiting team has a fast quarter or a slow one: the bill is the same either way. Napplied is priced differently, and here is why.

The published menu

Napplied's current commercial pricing is published on /employer/pricing (India · USD, tax excluded). Teams pick a platform subscription or a workflow pipeline for one role:

• Platform — Base: $150/month ($1,530/year with the yearly option). Search and run roles without the full workflow pipeline.
• Platform — Growth: $300/month ($3,060/year). More reach, with Morpheus AI interviews included up to the plan limit.
• Pipeline — Entry: $400 one-time for one job, source to offer, no monthly commitment.
• Pipeline — Max: $1,000 one-time for one job, larger credit and interview limits.
• Custom yearly quotes are available for higher volume. Extra Morpheus time beyond plan limits is billed separately.

There is no separate per-seat license fee stacked on top of this menu: you either subscribe to platform access or pay per pipeline for a single role.

$150/mo

Platform Base

$300/mo

Platform Growth

$400

Pipeline Entry (one role)

$1,000

Pipeline Max (one role)

Why this matters

Seat pricing and Napplied's published plans behave differently as hiring volume changes. A seat-priced tool costs the same in a quiet quarter as in a busy one: the vendor gets paid for logins, not throughput. A platform subscription is a predictable operating cost for ongoing search and interviews; a one-role pipeline ties spend to a specific requisition without a long seat renewal. For buyers comparing opaque enterprise ATS contracts to a published menu, that is a clearer budgeting conversation.

What this doesn't mean

To be precise about what this pricing model is and isn't. It's not a claim that Napplied eliminates recruiter headcount or replaces every human step in the hiring process — buyers still run final-loop interviews and keep an oversight team, and internal modeling (not yet independently measured) can put a full program's residual payroll and interview-time cost in the millions of dollars for a large hiring effort, on top of the platform or pipeline fee itself. What the pricing model does claim is narrower and more defensible: the cost of the product is published and tied to platform access or a specific role pipeline, not idle recruiter seats, and that structure is unusual enough in this market to be worth explaining on its own.

Pricing figures reflect Napplied's published commercial model on /employer/pricing as of October 2026 and are provided directly by Napplied; comparison figures (LinkedIn Recruiter, Greenhouse) are independently sourced buyer-reported pricing.